Hello, friends and enemies. Yesterday I came out of my accidental retirement from being a roller derby announcer and went to comment on some wheely shoe games in real life! Some people asked me if I’m “back,” and to that I say I didn’t really mean to leave, I was just busy and worried about covid (I’m still worried about covid if I’m being honest, but I am being as safe as I can be). That said, I am not planning to arrange my whole schedule around the derby calendar! I did have a lot of fun talking about derby, even if it was hard to dredge up some of the derby knowledge from my mind palace’s long-term storage. Still, I think by the end of the second game, most of it had come back to me. Everyone was very nice and complimented my outfit and my announcing. I even had some new people introduce themselves and tell me I should be announcing at every game. To that I say: thank you. And: pay me (lol kidding … but?).
Last weekend, my beloved friend Lito and his boyfriend Scott came for a visit and it was great! I want to hang out with my friends every day! Whoever arranged the world in a way where it’s impossible to hang out with friends deserves to be tried in the Hague. We had such a good time that I didn’t really take any pictures other than this heron we saw at the Davis Arboretum. We mostly just hung out, watched Drag Race, and ate good food. I don’t have a lot to say about it, you kinda had to be there.
Current Events
Remember when I used to say things like “This isn’t a news blog, but …”? Simpler times. Now I am the news.
City Council Madness
I had to go again to a city council meeting to tell them they are wrong about automated license plate readers (ALPRs) like Flock. At the last meeting, the city scheduled a presentation from the police about ALPRs and why they’re great actually (citation needed). Of course, we couldn’t let that go unchecked, so DeFlock Elk Grove coordinated to do some pre-bunking of things we thought the police might say during the meeting’s open comment period then debunk after the presentation to try to set the record straight. It’s very hard to say all that needs to be said in three-minute chunks, especially when the city and the police can (and do) talk as long as they want. I believe this may be a strategy to make us all go insane listening to them.
In my comment before the presentation, I essentially gave an opening argument for why we can’t trust what the police are going to tell us about ALPRs. Here’s what I said, or you can watch the video (and see the mayor get mad at me after my comment) here.
Hello, my name is Lindsey Halsell and I am an Elk Grove resident and a member of DeFlock Elk Grove, a citizen-led advocacy group dedicated to getting automated license plate readers (also called ALPRs) like Flock and Axon out of our city.
On August 3rd, we published an audit of the city’s use of Flock based on information obtained from public records act requests. Since then, we have repeatedly attempted to meet with city officials and asked the city to hold a town hall to discuss the findings. However, the mayor and city council have not accepted our invitations. We have additionally submitted requests to the California State Auditor and the Attorney General to investigate how Elk Grove’s use of ALPRs may have violated state laws.
Tonight the police will give a presentation on its use of Flock and ALPRs. They will likely focus on their most emotional success stories, like getting a ten-year-old child home safe, solving a mosque burglary, and holding a driver accountable for a fatality. They might even mention that Sheriff Jim Cooper said yesterday that Flock helped them capture someone who “executed” a woman.
We are always glad when crimes are solved and people make it home safe. No one disputes that. But we have to ask: how much of this success is really due to ALPRs?
The Elk Grove police have stated that they credit these wins to coordination with the real-time information center, information from fixed traffic cameras, and follow-up investigations, in addition to Flock. In the case of the crime Sheriff Cooper mentioned, there were witnesses on the scene and someone had identified the suspect’s license plate. Those aren’t Flock’s successes. The police were able to find the suspect quickly because people were on the scene and saw the crime. Flock helped the police make an arrest faster. That’s it. Even with ALPRs, the police still needed to talk to people, identify suspects, and investigate the crime. If ALPRs are such strong tools, then the police should be able to tell us exactly how many cases were cleared because of Flock. If all they do is share emotional anecdotes, we don’t know if the system is as important as they claim it is, but we will know that they are trying to manipulate us into supporting them.
We also know from reporting out of the Atlanta metro, which has over 5,000 Flock cameras, that crime clearance rates have not improved since the cameras were installed. If ALPRs were that essential to solving crimes, we would expect to see much higher clearance rates, especially in Flock’s hometown.
Flock has published materials to help law enforcement convince cities that Flock is worth the risk. They advise police departments to provide a “carefully scripted presentation” and control the narrative. All the police will do tonight is attempt to win the war for the narrative. This is not a meaningful effort to hear our concerns. This is damage control after 21 people came to the last city council meeting to say we don’t want ALPRs in Elk Grove.
Flock’s materials advise police not to “avoid the concept of mass surveillance because you’re not going to convince opponents that it’s not.” Flock never claims it’s not conducting mass surveillance and they can’t truthfully claim that, which is why they have to focus on encouraging police to make emotional pleas, rather than stick to the facts. This is mass surveillance, and we don’t want it here.
The police presentation was very trying. They claimed that ALPRs do “not conduct facial recognition.” This might technically be true, but it’s a distinction without a difference. Wired and 404 Media recently reported on Flock’s code, which absolutely does track people, though I can believe it may not use facial recognition. I think the fact that the police used that specific term may be obscuring that Flock’s system can do in regards to identifying people since “facial recognition” is a specific technology.
Some of the information in the presentation apparently corroborates what DeFlock Elk Grove found in its community audit. For example, Elk Grove Police said that they removed access to Flock’s national lookup tool, which would include Elk Grove data on the Flock database for people to search, in 2024. The thing is, sharing ALPR data outside of California has been illegal per SB 34 since 2016. So, are they indirectly admitting that they broke the law for years before they stopped? This information was presented as if it’s meant to reassure us, but all I got from it was that Elk Grove Police Department was illegally sharing data with other states and federal agencies until 2024.
After the presentation, the city invited the Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper to speak. He spent at least twenty minutes being very emotional and telling us that we’re terrible people for not wanting to use this technology. I was glad that I had referenced an interview Cooper had done earlier in the week, about a woman being shot and the police claiming they were able to make a quick arrest thanks to ALPRs, beforehand. While he credits ALPRs for the quick arrest, he also says that there were witnesses on the scene who saw the suspect’s license plate. What really offend me about this story though—and I didn’t know this until after the meeting—is that the woman who was killed had a restraining order against her killer. This story isn’t about the success of ALPRs, it’s about the absolute failure of the police to protect a woman who had already followed proper channels to try to keep herself safe. Police are letting women be killed in broad daylight then claiming we need a fucking panopticon to keep us safe. Once again: ALPRs can only be used reactively. They do not prevent crime; they may observe crime. What do the cops need to keep someone with an active restraining order from being killed by her stalker? Maybe we should focus on that instead of buying more cameras.
Here’s my comment after the presentation, which you can watch here.
Hello. Thank you to the police for that presentation and I wish I had as much time to speak as the sheriff did, but I suppose I will make do.
First of all, I want to reiterate that no one who’s against ALRPs is pro-crime and against victims. We want crimes to be solved. We don’t want there to be crime in the first place! But this is not the answer.
Today in the presentation, the police mentioned that they retain ALPR data for 30 days and that’s also something they’ve mentioned previously this year in another ALPR presentation. However, this does contradict the city’s ALPR Overview and Facts page, section 462.4 Data Collection and Retention states that “All ALPR data downloaded to the server should be stored for a minimum of one year” So, even though the police are giving this presentation, we’re getting conflicting information from the city and from the police about what happens to the data.
Regardless of how long the Elk Grove police think they are storing ALPR data, the reality is they have much less control than they believe. We know Flock retains data indefinitely because their own representative recently said so a few week ago in a city council meeting in Marietta, Oklahoma.
The police chief said, “We want this technology, but we want it to be done responsibly,” and we want that too. We want responsible ownership of this data, and unfortunately, Flock’s making it very clear that that’s not possible. Flock goes out of its way to gather data, whether local governments know about it or not. In Sheboygan, Wisconsin, city officials were not informed that their Flock cameras would track driving speeds and movement patterns, but after recently attempting to cancel their Flock contract, sales representatives contacted the mayor offering to sell the city five years of this very data. Flock was gathering more information than the city knew about or consented to.
Elk Grove police say they don’t have people search enabled in the Flock system. However, that doesn’t mean that Flock isn’t collecting that data. It means that search function is turned off for you. They may still be collecting the data just like we saw in this Wisconsin example. We also saw Grass Valley recently informed Flock that they were canceling their contract and had the police remove the cameras. yet Flock came out to conduct “maintenance” and reinstall the cameras.
Flock does not see individual police departments as customers. Although you are paying for Flock’s ALPRs and access to its network, the real customer is whoever buys the data. Your job is to farm information. In February, Flock updated its terms and conditions to remove the statement “Flock does not own and shall not sell Customer Data.” They state that Flock has a “perpetual, worldwide license to use and disclose customer data … and use customer data to support and improve Flock’s products and services.” These are the terms a company would have if it were using you to collect data and then selling that data behind your back.
It is at best naive for the city and the police department to assume that they have control over data collected through Flock and ALPRs.
We got a smattering of news coverage after the meeting:
- DeFlock Elk Grove increases pressure on Mayor Singh-Allen over ALPR cameras
- Elk Grove Police, Sheriff and DA defend ALPR surveillance: First of two-part story
- Part 2: Elk Grove residents challenge police defense of ALPR surveillance
- Folsom is dropping its Flock license plate cameras, two council members say (this one isn’t about Elk Grove but they quoted me!)
I also have been taking some more media requests so there will be more Flock news in the near future.
What’s really going on between Flock and the City of Elk Grove?
I keep bringing this up when I talk to reporters but I have yet to see anyone investigate. The City of Elk Grove is adamant about how great Flock is and they keep voting unanimously to keep it and expand it, while many other cities have caved under the weight of their citizen’s disapproval. I would love to know if the City of Elk Grove has some kind of financial relationship with Flock (beyond the obvious one where the City pays Flock for its services). Like, are they getting a discount? I’m asking because Elk Grove is all over Flock’s fucking website and appears in training materials.
- From October 17, 2025: Flock Aerodome Software Updates: Fall 2025. Elk Grove/Sacramento’s Real Time Information Center (a big police coordination dispatch center) is featured and there is a person clearly wearing an “Elk Grove Police Department” patch in the video a little over one minute in.
- From May 12, 2025: A Connected Future: How Elk Grove PD is Redefining Public Safety with Drone Technology
- From June 20, 2023: Customer Story | Elk Grove Police Department
- From a webinar that Flock corporate gave to police departments teaching them “how they could surveil the No Kings protests and ‘small parades’ using a mix of Flock’s technology and law enforcement’s own databases,” as reported by 404 Media: One of the slides clearly reads “ELK GROVE POLICE: 09/12/2021 Joint Car Meet/Sideshow Operation”
No one is showing up in someone else’s promotional materials free of charge. That’s a paid gig. Why is Elk Grove specifically one of Flock’s poster children? How is this affecting our city government’s decisions about the use of ALPRs? Reporters, please, I am begging you to investigate!
Books and Other Words
The Eye of the Bedlam Bride is the sixth book in Matt Dinniman’s Dungeon Crawler Carl series. This book felt like a typical mid-series book to me. There was a lot going on that seems like it will pay off in the next book (the big “faction wars” that they have been building up to, in which real people enter the dungeon to battle the crawlers), and that’s fine and normal, but this is an 800-page book. One of the game mechanics in this part of the dungeon was that the crawlers were playing a Pokemon-like game, so we had to hear a lot about cards and rules and whatnot, which is not especially my jam. I still enjoyed the book overall but I don’t think it’s the strongest in the series!
Meanwhile, on the internet:
- You’re Not Hallucinating: The Amount of Recalled Food Is Skyrocketing via The New Republic. I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that the current food safety hellscape was completely predictable given that the FDA was “making plans to end its routine safety inspections” in April 2025. And now we can’t even have salted caramel ice cream.
- USPS whistleblower describes new plans for voting by mail hidden from the public via CNN. More fuckery to prevent as many people as possible from casting their vote because the administration knows they will lose a fair fight. Be very careful with getting your vote in this November!
- Flock Offers Employees Buyouts as Customers Flee via Wired. Lol. Lmao even.
- Jeopardy! hid a deep-cut Bluesky joke about “the slut gnomes of false Berlin” in today’s episode via AV Club. As a Chronically Online (TM) person, I found this quite funny. Jeopardy! host Ken Jennings got the writers to reference an insane Jeopardy parody post on the show this week.
Doctors Hate Her! One Weird Trick for Sleeping Well
Last time I said I got a new CPAP and it took me a few days to sort it out and sleep correctly. Well. It actually took two weeks because things did go downhill. This CPAP has a little display that tells you how many “events” per hour you experienced during the night (an event is when you stop breathing). I was putting up very high numbers for someone wearing a CPAP and Kirk said I had been snoring (exactly what using a CPAP should address). I was also waking up with a sore throat. After a night of something like eight events per hour, I decided I had to call the medical equipment company and ask them to increase the air pressure because my throat was feeling trashed and I was exhausted. I was informed that my machine was set for my prescribed air pressure and I had to talk to my doctor if I had a problem. I was not willing to wait for this shit to work through six to eight more people to be resolved.
Did you know you can find user guides online for just about any product? I got my hot little hands on the ResMed AirSense 11 guide to see how to open up the clinical options. It’s easy enough—just press two fingers on the screen and wait a moment. I discovered that yes, my air pressure was set to 11. However, CPAPs are able to adjust and give you different amounts of air throughout the night and my new CPAP was set to give me one consistent amount of air all night, no matter what. So I enabled the “Autoset” mode and set the air pressure range to cover everything (hacking!). Wouldn’t you know it? I slept so much better that night. I only had 0.4 events per hour. So, here’s a hearty “you are bad at your job and you should feel bad” to whoever set this CPAP up for me because you made me sleep horribly for two entire weeks of my life.
Moving It
Last week I didn’t manage to work out at all, and this week isn’t quite over yet so I don’t have stickers to show you. In lieu of this, I will share with you my secret pre-workout snack for increased performance: all-red gummy bears.
Kitchen Witchery
There’s been too much going on for me to cook anything of interest, so please enjoy this photo of a burrito I made. I make the chicken in the slow cooker (throw an onion and jalapño and salt in there), use the arroz rojo recipe from Mi Cocina, and I make beans based on vibes alone.
Cat Therapy
Fritz has been behaving a little better. We recently discovered that if we dig a hole in the litter box so that the bottom of the box is visible, he is more likely to pee there. Yes, this is diva behavior, but we are doing it because the alternative is pee on the floor. We also bought a spray that is supposed to deter cats from peeing in places (Nature’s Miracle No Spraying, I think it’s called) and that seems to help but only sort of. Fritz did see the vet last week. Apparently he is physically fine. We secured a Prozac prescription for him and he’ll be starting that soon. Let’s hope it helps him.
Finally, here are some cat photos for your nerves. As a special treat, Kirk has granted permission to show you two pictures of him with Fritz.
















































































































































